Artefact
These pages are from one of those āthick greetings cardā books. I spotted this one in a shop while out on a walk the other day.
Doesnāt it precisely represent the kind of weak-ass, not-quite-gallows humour found in offices?
As a humorist and Escapologist, hereās what I read in this two-page spread:
Escape is impossible. Creative thought is ridiculous. Metaphor is pretension. The past is lost. Even our own feeble, institutional attempts at improvement ā āgoing on a courseā ā are futile.
Also note the aesthetically-pukesome hyphenation of āwellbeingā used almost exclusively by management.
Yuck. Happy Monday.
Itās a Shit Business
The reason there are folk on the comedy circuit miserably plodding on, dead behind the eyes, is because theyāve done the same thing for however many years. How can that possibly be creatively stimulating on any level? Itās monotonous toil for a wage, and Iām sure none of us ever started with that goal. Itās a harsh truth that being a jobbing comic will often sap the time and energy that you could spend creating something you really would like to do.
Thinking that stand-up comedy might be your escape from mindless servitude? Think again, says the lovely Ian Boldsworth in a candid essay on his revamped website.
Comics boast to each other that they have no boss, that they are this free spirited, uncensored community who have the luxury of being able to say whatever they want for the catharsis of the masses. The reality has moved away from that. Any jobbing circuit comedian who thinks they donāt have a boss and can say what they want is deluded.
Boldsworth recently quit stand-up in favour of art production, writing, podcasting, and independent film production. Canāt blame him at all. Hereās some info about his film, which (as a Parapod fan) Iām looking forward to seeing. Stop crying.
What Do You Do? Redux
Here are two more escapological nuggets from Miranda Sawyerās Out of Time, discussed on Friday. (Hereās a link to actually buy the book, since Iām quoting from it so liberally.)
On āWhat do you do?ā Miranda says:
Such an odd thing to ask. What do I do? Lots of things, Nosy. I wasnāt used to the question. Nobody asked that in Manchester, no one asked it in clubs. It was too personal, a bit police-y. If you met someone for the first time, you would just give your first name ā if you even said that ā and then youād try to make each other laugh. Comment on the situation you were in, talk music, or dance moves, or maybe football or DJs. Your job never came into it.
This supports my sense of the questionās prevalence being new, a product perhaps of neoliberalsm. Miranda had to go to the bright lights of London to experience it in the 1990s. Today itās the first thing people ask even here in stinky old Glasgow.
Iāve mentioned this before, but Victorian etiquette expert Emily Post wrote that āwhat do you do?ā is a uniquely boorish thing to say to someone at a social event. Leave work at the door for crying out loud and donāt make people compete with you for status.
Speaking of status:
One of the things I notice now is that in conversations with other people thereās always a status element. Itās disguised but its there. So if someone says theyāre so busy they canāt cope, theyāre really saying āIām important because Iām indispensable.ā [ā¦] Going out to gigs, getting hammered? Still relevant, not old. Know whatās going on locally? In touch with authentic experience. Kids picked for the sports team? Great parenting, plus talent passing down the generations.
This is something I discuss in Escape the Deathly Humblebrag. Letās smash the work ethic by expunging it from our language!
ā Pleasey-weasy support New Escapologist on Patreon to help keep this blog online and so I can write long-form essays of deep and sexy substance.
Escapology as Crisis
Iām reading Out of Time by Miranda Sawyer. Itās a recent book about midlife crises.
At 34, Iām not quite the intended reader but you never know how long youāve got left, so the concept of āmidlife,ā is surely always relevant. Who are you to assume youāve got a full 83-year lifespan to work with, Mr Complacent-pants? Weāre all in a state of mid-life no matter how far along one happens to be. As in āI am amid life.ā (Fuck off, that absolutely works).
Iām reading the book because I heard Miranda interviewed on a podcast and I liked her. She strikes me as someone who lives quite fully and wonāt have many regrets, but is also aware of mortality and temporariness. That, my friends, is how to live. Her book has been described as āanti-self-helpā but itās really an introspective memoir about youth ā as seen from the vantage point of being 45 in 2016 ā and time moving on.
As someone who lived through the brilliant, sanguine ā90s and inherited the cultural changes delivered by clubbing, ecstacy, Madchester, Steve Coogan, Britpop and all those magazines but was a bit too young to experience it properly, Iām finding it fascinating. From my perspective, itās a very-recent-history book, about the ten years that came before my adult consciousness kicked in. Explanations at last!
Anyway, something that struck me are the bookās various descriptions of midlife crisis. Frankly, I think Iāve been in a state of crisis since I was about 11 years old. Itās the sense of there not being enough time to do the things you want to do despite them being relatively modest, the feeling that the odds are against you, and the sense that escape is a solution, and perhaps the only one.
There were other feelings. A sort of mourning. A weighing up, while feeling weighed down. A desire to escape ā run away, quick! ā that came on strong in the middle of the night.
and:
I would wake at the wrong time, filled with pointless energy, and start ripping up my life from the inside. Planning crazy schemes. Iād be giving [my daughter] her milk at 4am and simultaneously mapping out my escape, mentally choosing the bag Iād take when I left, packing it (socks, laptop, towels), imagining how long Iād last on my savings. Iād be rediscovering the old me, the real one that was somewhere buried beneath the piles of muslin wipes and my failing fortysomething body. Iād be living life gloriously.
So maybe Escapology is the practical application of crisis. This shouldnāt be a surprise. Many people whoāve told me about their sudden, deliberate change in life direction also mention an epiphany ā a moment when youāve got one foot in the commuter train and the other still on the platform and you say āno moreā ā and what is that but a crisis?
Look at this beauty:
In short, you wake one day and everything is wrong. You thought you would be somewhere else, someone else. Itās as though you went out one warm evening ā an evening fizzing with delicious potential ā you went out for just one drinkā¦ and woke up two days later in a skip. Except youāre not in a skip, youāre in an estate car, on the way to an out-of-town shopping mall to buy a balance bike, a roof rack and some stackable storage boxes. āItās all a mistake!ā you shout. āI shouldnāt be here! This life was meant for someone else! Someone who would like it! Someone who would know what to do!ā
I genuinely remember feeling this way when being sent off to secondary school. And again, later, when walking a steep incline one morning to reach a university lecture I didnāt want to attend, to get a degree was ambivalent about, to get a job Iād barely be able to tolerate.
Perhaps a midlife crisis can be experienced at any age, especially to those with strong ideas about the kind of life they want or at least a strong sense of direction that isnāt being granted by inertia alone.
ā Pleeeeeease support New Escapologist on Patreon to help this blog keep going and so I can write long-form essays of deep and sexy substance.